1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 164 F.3d
  5. 164 F.3d 1189 (1999)
 

CAL. PROLIFE COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION v. SCULLY

No. 98-15308.

164 F.3d 1189 (1999)

CALIFORNIA PROLIFE COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE; Service Employees Union, Local 22; AFC-CIO; California State Council of Service Employees/Cope; California Teachers Association; Association of Better Citizenship; Consumer Attorneys of California; Consumer Attorney Political Action; Consumer Attorneys Independent Campaign Committee; California Faculty Association Political Action Committee; San Mateo Labor Council; Richard Polanco; Polanco For Senate; Wright Roderick; Rod Wright For Assembly; Michael R. Shapiro; California Democratic Party; Howard S. Welinsky; Garry Shay; Michael Schroeder; California Republican Party; Bill Leonard; Leonard For Assembly '98 Committee; Lincoln Club of Orange County Committee for State and Local Candidates; Shawn Steel; Marc Wolin; Marjorie C. Swartz; Nell Soto; Dennis Sanchez; Michael Green; Michael Lewis; Douglas Dunlap, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jan SCULLY, District Attorney for Sacramento County, Defendant, and Fair Political Practices Commission, Defendant-Appellant, Ruth Holton; Tony Miller, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 5, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence T. Woodlock, Fair Political Practices Commission, Sacramento, California, for defendant-appellant Fair Political Practices Commission.

Bradley S. Phillips, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-intervenors-appellants Ruth Holton and Tony Miller.

James Bopp, Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom, Terre Haute, Indiana, for plaintiffs-appellees California Prolife Council Political Action Committee.

Joseph Remcho, Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-appellees Service Employees International Union.

John Mueller, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, Mill Valley, California, for plaintiffs-appellees California Republican Party.

George Waters, Olson, Hagel, Fong, Leidigh, Waters & Fishburn, Sacramento, California, for plaintiffs-appellees California Democratic Party.

Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This is an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of Proposition 208, a California campaign finance initiative adopted by the voters in 1996. When reviewing the grant of a preliminary injunction, our inquiry is narrow. See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.1995)(quoting Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International, 686 F.2d 750

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases