LAMARE v. NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE

No. 98-258.

743 A.2d 598 (1999)

Chasidy LAMARE and Charles Arnold v. NORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE, Darcie Fitzgerald, and John and Jane Doe.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 12, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarke D. Atwell, Law Office of Robert A. Gensburg, St. Johnsbury, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jeff W. Lively of Olson & Associates, Stowe, for Defendants-Appellees.

Beth Robinson of Langrock Sperry & Wool, Middlebury, and Roger A. Kindler and Paul J. Tanis, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae the Humane Society of the United States, et al.

Present AMESTOY, C.J., and DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.


MORSE, J.

Plaintiffs Chasidy Lamare and Charles Arnold appeal a summary judgment of the Lamoille Superior Court in favor of defendants North Country Animal League, Darcie Fitzgerald, and John and Jane Doe. Plaintiffs raise numerous claims challenging the court's ruling that their possessory interest in a lost dog had been transferred to defendants under the Town of Wolcott's dog control ordinance. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. Plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases