1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 166 F.3d
  5. 166 F.3d 1172 (1999)
 

THOMSON, S.A. v. QUIXOTE CORP.

No. 97-1485.

166 F.3d 1172 (1999)

THOMSON, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUIXOTE CORPORATION and Disc Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 25, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Badenoch, Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Richard L. Mayer, John Flock, and Robert F. Perry.

Thomas L. Giannetti, Fish & Neave, of New York City, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Harold V. Johnson, and James B. Blanchard, Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois.

Before RICH, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Thomson, S.A. ("Thomson") appeals from the June 24, 1997 order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in an action for patent infringement. See Thomson, S.A. v. Quixote Corp., 979 F.Supp. 286 (D.Del.1997) ("Thomson I"). The court denied Thomson's motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or in the alternative for a new trial, and sustained the jury verdict that U.S. Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases