CAMP v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

No. 98-35465.

183 F.3d 1141 (1999)

Orville J. CAMP, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; Indian Hill Limited Partnership; The Nature Conservancy, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 20, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Stotter, Bahr & Stotter Law Offices, Eugene, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Ellen D. Katz, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee United States Bureau of Land Management.

Christopher L. Cauble, Walter L. Cauble, Shultz, Salisbury, Cauble & Dole, Grants Pass, Oregon, for defendant-appellee Indian Hill Limited Partnership.

Gregory J. Miner, Bogle & Gates, Portland, Oregon, for defendant-appellee The Nature Conservancy.

Before: CANBY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge.


FOGEL, District Judge:

The district court found that appellant's challenges to a transfer of land made by the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) were time-barred because the statute of limitations began to run when BLM published notice of the proposed land transfer in the Federal Register.2 We conclude that publication of notice in the Federal Register was insufficient to trigger the statute of limitations because BLM had a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases