PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of disputed issues of material fact relating to (1) whether the second Endorsement Binder purportedly received by the appellee was a forgery or was genuine, if such a document even existed in the first place, and (2) whether Insurance Depot was the agent of the appellant or the appellee, the trial court was in error in granting the appellee's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Accordingly, the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
