BRUGGEMAN v. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. C9-98-212.

591 N.W.2d 705 (1999)

William L. BRUGGEMAN, et al., Respondents, v. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 15, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary A. VanCleve, James M. Susag, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Bloomington, for appellant.

David F. Herr, James J. Killian, Michael C. McCarthy, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the merger doctrine applies to an agreement giving the seller the right to repurchase a parcel of real property if the buyer has not started development of the property within two years. The court of appeals, reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment for the buyer, concluded that the merger doctrine does not apply to agreements that are both a condition subsequent and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases