Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 (a) and in granting defendant's cross motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 2004 and 3012 (d) compelling acceptance of the answer. Defendant established that its delay in answering the complaint was the result of an inadvertent error of one of its claims representatives (see, De Nooyer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.