KRIM v. PRONET, INC.

C.A. No. 15873.

744 A.2d 523 (1999)

Jerry KRIM, Plaintiff, v. PRONET, INC., Jackie R. Kimzey, David J. Vucina, Max D. Hopper, Harvey B. Cash, and Edward E. Jungerman, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided: September 14, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Morris of Morris and Morris, Wilmington, Delaware; of counsel: Law Firm of Harvey Greenfield, New York, New York, for Plaintiffs.

James L. Holzman and Ronald A. Brown, Jr. of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, Delaware; of counsel: Charles W. Schwartz of Vinson & Elkins, Houston, Texas, for Defendants.


OPINION

STEELE, V.C.

In his Amended Complaint ("Complaint"), shareholder Jerry Krim ("Plaintiff") alleges that the directors of ProNet, Inc. ("ProNet") breached their fiduciary duty by failing to secure a higher exchange ratio for ProNet shares in a merger with MetroCall Inc. ("MetroCall"), and by placing their personal interests above the interests of ProNet stockholders during the negotiations with MetroCall. Later, in his Answering Brief to Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases