FINK v. GOMEZ

No. CV 96-2652 JSL.

39 F.Supp.2d 1225 (1999)

David FINK, Petitioner, v. James GOMEZ, Respondent.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

March 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stephen G. Perry, Woodland Hills, CA, pro per, David Fink, Anaheim, CA, Danilo J. Becerra, Moreno, Becerra & Gerrero, Montebello, CA, Diana Carloni Nourse, Cihigoyenetche, Grossberg & Clouse, Ontario, CA, Catherine J. Malich, DAG, Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner.

Anthony Da Silva, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for respondent.


ORDER

LETTS, District Judge.

On January 28, 1999, the court issued an Order to Show Cause Why Respondent's Counsel in the Ylst Case Should Not Be Sanctioned ("OSC"), which detailed the matters about which the court was considering sanctions against attorney Diana Carloni Nourse. After receiving briefing from the parties in response to the OSC, the matter was heard on February 22, 1999.

For the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases