NADALIN v. AUTOMOBILE RECOVERY BUREAU, INC.

No. 98-2601.

169 F.3d 1084 (1999)

Michael NADALIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AUTOMOBILE RECOVERY BUREAU, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 12, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Edelman (argued), Edelman & Combs, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John D. Lien (argued), Foley & Lardner, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Chief Judge.

This is a class action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., against a company that repossesses motor vehicles as an agent of creditors who have a security interest. The appeal, which is from the dismissal of the suit for failure to state a claim, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), presents an issue of first impression at the appellate level concerning the provision of the Act regulating repossession, 15...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases