U.S. v. HICKEY

No. 98-10305.

185 F.3d 1064 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John A. HICKEY; Mamie Tang, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 9, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Shapiro, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

David J. Cohen, Law Office of David J. Cohen, San Francisco, California, and William Weiner, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.


SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue is whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory criminal appeal by the United States. The government seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing to unseal the criminal defendants' financial affidavits, which the defendants were required to file in support of their request for court-appointed counsel. We hold that we lack jurisdiction because the appeal does not fall within the statutory rule that only final...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases