By a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), appellant attacks his 1991 habitual offender sentence as being illegal because the requisite predicate crimes were allegedly not proven. Rule 3.800(a) is limited to the correction of illegal sentences which do not require an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Mancino,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ADLINGTON v. STATE
No. 99-0371.
735 So.2d 513 (1999)
Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 28, 1999.
April 28, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sara Blumberg of Sara Blumberg, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Office of the State Attorney, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.