WILKES v. ZURLINDEN

(CC 93-3620-L-3, Agency No. 17988-101; CA A91278 (Control), A91800; SC S44912)

984 P.2d 261 (1999)

328 Or. 626

Allen WILKES, dba S.A.W. Construction, Respondent on Review, v. Dennis ZURLINDEN and Sharie Zurlinden, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review. Allen Wilkes and Shirley Wilkes, dba S.A.W. Construction, Petitioners Below, v. Construction Contractors Board, Dennis Zurlinden and Sharie Zurlinden, Respondents Below.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 11, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William V. Deatherage, of Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson & Clarke, P.C., Medford, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition was John R. Huttl.

Matthew Sutton, of Kellington, Krack, Richmond, Blackhurst & Sutton, LLP, Medford, argued the cause for respondents on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, DURHAM, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.


LEESON, J.

In this action on a construction contract, the issue is whether the trial court erred in designating defendants as the prevailing party under ORS 20.0961 and awarding them attorney fees under the parties' contract. After a trial in which it denied affirmative relief to both plaintiff2 and defendants, the court designated only defendants as the prevailing party. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases