1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 590 N.W.2d
  5. 590 N.W.2d 641 (1999)
 

HERRMANN v. McMENOMY & SEVERSON

No. C2-98-388.

590 N.W.2d 641 (1999)

Al HERRMANN, Respondents, v. McMENOMY & SEVERSON, et al., petitioners, Appellants, Bolin, Rucinski & Company, Ltd., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 8, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Thomas, Byron G. Ascheman, Burke & Thomas, St. Paul, for appellants McMenomy & Severson.

Howard Groves, Burnsville, for defendants Bolin, Rucinski & Co.

Stoneking Law Office, Gary Stoneking, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

On October 31, 1996, respondents Al Herrmann (Herrmann), the sole owner and only employee of Al Herrmann Construction, Inc. (AHC), and AHC commenced a legal malpractice action against appellants McMenomy & Severson, P.A. and two of its attorneys, Michael G. Dougherty and Larry S. Severson (hereinafter collectively referred to as "McMenomy & Severson").1 The complaint alleged that McMenomy &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases