PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Calvin Anderson, raises two issues on appeal. His first argument is that the court erred in admitting into evidence a photographic lineup comprised of photos that were identifiable as "mug shots". We hold the error in admitting the photos to be harmless. See D'Anna v. State,
Appellant's second issue is directed to the mandatory minimum term of his three year...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.