Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and other crimes. Defendant contends that he had automatic standing to challenge the search of the premises because of the statutory presumption of knowing possession under Penal Law § 220.25 (see, People v Tejada,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
