Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
By failing to object to comments made by the prosecutor on summation, defendant failed to preserve for our review his present contention that those comments constituted misconduct (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Reversal is not required as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice because the prosecutor's comments were not so inflammatory that defendant was denied a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.