U.S. v. HANLEY

Nos. 98-10010, 98-10011, 98-10012 and 98-10294.

190 F.3d 1017 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl R. HANLEY, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall E. Moore, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William B. Scott, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John William Fry, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 8, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony P. Sgro, Patti & Sgro, Las Vegas, Nevada; Curt Obront and Paul A. McKenna, McKenna & Obront, Coconut Grove, Florida; David J. Kramer, Novi, Michigan, for the defendants-appellants.

Daniel S. Goodman, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Appellate Section, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: NOONAN, THOMPSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.


GRABER, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated appeal, defendants Carl R. Hanley, Randall E. Moore, William B. Scott, Jr., and John William Fry appeal from their convictions and sentences for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and money laundering. Defendants' convictions stem from their operation of a fraudulent telemarketing enterprise, Legendary Concepts, Inc. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases