STATE v. ROCHA-RAMOS

(97P3137; CA A98765).

985 P.2d 217 (1999)

161 Or. App. 306

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Manuel ROCHA-RAMOS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 7, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lester E. Seto, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Laura S. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b) (1995), that was entered after a stipulated facts trial. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.1 We reverse.

In its order denying defendant's motion to suppress, the trial court made the following findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases