CALCAGNO v. DREW


263 A.D.2d 939 (1999)

694 N.Y.S.2d 248

VINCENT CALCAGNO, Respondent, v. THEODORE DREW, Defendant, and HAROLD GOLD, as Nominee, et al., Appellants. (And Another Related Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided July 29, 1999.


Carpinello, J.

The essential facts in this case are not in dispute. The legal conclusions to be drawn from these facts, however, are in dispute. At issue is whether two letters exchanged between attorneys referencing the placement of funds in escrow are sufficient to create a valid escrow agreement. Because we find that they are sufficient, we affirm.

As part of his purchase of a pizzeria restaurant business, interpleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases