OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KURTZ

No. 97-2182.

85 Ohio St.3d 34 (1999)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KURTZ.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 10, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Phillip Kurtz, pro se.


Per Curiam.

The practice of law includes counseling clients as well as drafting documents and appearing in court. After he was suspended from the practice of law, respondent, by his own admission, counseled clients and, at least in one case, appeared in court. Respondent unquestionably practiced law not only after we suspended him indefinitely but also after we denied his motion for reconsideration.

Moreover, respondent failed to carry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases