Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court did not err in treating plaintiffs' order to show cause as a motion to renew. In his answering papers, defendant also treated plaintiffs' papers as a motion to renew or to reargue, and thus defendant cannot be heard to argue that he was thereby prejudiced (see, CPLR 2001). Plaintiffs provided a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts in their original motion, i.e., they previously...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
