1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 36 (1999)
 

HONSICKLE v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B121554.

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 36 (1999)

69 Cal.App.4th 756

Earl Joseph HONSICKLE et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Iwona Wysocki et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Review Denied May 19, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horvitz & Levy, Barry R. Levy, Lisa Perrochet, Jon B. Eisenberg; Bollington, Stilz, Bloeser & Curry and Kent G. Mariconda for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Fizzolio & McLeod and Stephen R. McLeod for Real Parties in Interest.

CROSKEY, J.

This is the latest in a series of cases which involve the scope and application of Proposition 213, enacted by the voters on November 5, 1996.1 Essentially, this initiative prohibits (1) recovery of any damages by a convicted felon for injuries caused in the commission of or flight from the felony (Civ.Code, § 3333.3)2 and (2) recovery of noneconomic damages by any drunk driver, uninsured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases