PEOPLE v. HANKIN


182 Misc.2d 1003 (1999)

701 N.Y.S.2d 778

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MARK HANKIN, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

September 3, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Victor Barall of counsel), for appellant.

Michael Handwerker, New York City, for respondent.

KASSOFF, P. J., and CHETTA, J., concur; PATTERSON, J., dissents in a separate memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

The factual allegations of the information provide reasonable cause to believe that the defendant violated section 482 of the Judiciary Law. Essentially, the information alleges that the informant had referred cases to the defendant in the past for a fee, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases