1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 100 F.Supp.2d
  5. 100 F.Supp.2d 1073 (1999)
 

GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. TEKTRONIX, INC.

No. CV 99-02476 SVW (RCx).

100 F.Supp.2d 1073 (1999)

GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT, INC., d/b/a Digital Images, Plaintiff, v. TEKTRONIX, INC., an Oregon Corporation, and Avid Technology, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

September 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey T. Makoff of Makoff Kinnear Counsel P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Stanley M. Gorinson, John L. Longstreth and Jeffrey Marks of Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

ORDER DISMISSING ANTITRUST CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

WILSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

As is so often the case in antitrust law, a deceptively simple set of facts forces the Court to confront a doctrinal quagmire. This case requires the Court to determine whether a rental firm, owning and renting only one type of video editing system, suffers antitrust injury if the only two manufacturers

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases