Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Contrary to the contention of defendant, the evidence that he signed a name other than his own to a fingerprint card is legally sufficient to sustain his conviction of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [2]; see, People v Van Schoick,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.