Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that County Court erred in accepting his plea because he did not admit the forcible stealing element of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05). Defendant concedes that he has not preserved that contention for our review because he did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v DeJesus,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.