1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 987 P.2d
  5. 987 P.2d 183 (1999)
 

STATE, CSED v. BROMLEY

Nos. S-7833, S-7883.

987 P.2d 183 (1999)

STATE of Alaska, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Keith W. BROMLEY, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

September 17, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Fairbanks, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Bret D. Cook, Cook, Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc., Fairbanks, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Before MATTHEWS, Chief Justice, COMPTON, EASTAUGH, FABE, and BRYNER, Justices.

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of a dispute over child support payments. Keith Bromley argues that he is entitled to a refund from the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) because CSED acted outside its authority in establishing his support obligation. He also contends that in modifying his child support obligation, the superior court should have applied Pennsylvania law instead...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases