Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Petitioner contends that the determination finding him guilty of using a controlled substance should have been annulled because the same correction officer performed the two EMIT tests. We disagree. Both tests were properly performed by the same correction officer because a different trained individual was not available (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e] [1] [former (iv)]; cf., Matter of Simpkins v Riley...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.