1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 65 F.Supp.2d
  5. 65 F.Supp.2d 1097 (1999)
 

U.S. EX REL. BARAJAS v. NORTHROP CORP.

No. CV 87-7288 AHM (KX).

65 F.Supp.2d 1097 (1999)

UNITED STATES ex rel. Leocadio BARAJAS, Plaintiff, v. NORTHROP CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse Sunny Young, Herbert Hafif Law Offices, Claremont, CA, William K. Hanagami, King Williams & Hanagami, Los Angeles, CA, Phillip E. Benson, Phillip E. Benson Law Offices, Orange, CA, Donald R. Warren, Estep & Warren, San Diego, CA, for Leocadio Barajas.

Jesse Sunny Young, Herbert Hafif Law Offices, Claremont, CA, for Patricia Meyer, U.S.

Brad D. Brian, Munger Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, William A. Molinski, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson, Los Angeles, CA, Shannon L. Haralson, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, DC, for Northrop Corp.

ORDER DENYING QUI TAM RELATOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF SHARE OF RECOVERY

MATZ, District Judge.

Through this motion, qui tam relator Leocadio Barajas seeks to recover $750,000 as his alleged share of the "proceeds" allegedly recovered by the Air Force in an August 1991 Agreement ("Agreement") it reached with Defendant Northrop to resolve a suspension/debarment proceeding initiated by the Air Force. Barajas argues that the money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases