ALLTUCKER v. CITY OF SALEM

(97-03007; CA A101436).

993 P.2d 159 (1999)

164 Or. App. 643

In the Matter of the Compensation of Scott Alltucker, Claimant. Scott ALLTUCKER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SALEM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph E. Wiser, III, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bennett, Hartman, Reynolds & Wiser.

Chess Trethewy, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Joseph D. Robertson and Garrett, Hemann, Robertson, Paulus, Jennings & Comstock, P.C.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.


WOLLHEIM, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order upholding the City of Salem's (city) denial of his claim. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7) and ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Claimant is a firefighter and paramedic for the city. His monthly schedule consists of alternating shifts as either a paramedic or a firefighter. He can be assigned to any of the city's stations. The city issues a monthly report that shows the shift schedules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases