RICKERT v. TOMAT

No. 98-422.

732 So.2d 414 (1999)

Craig Lawrence RICKERT, Appellant, v. Keith Eugene TOMAT and Line Lilaberte, his wife, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sparkman, Robb, Mason & Ginsburg, and James T. Sparkman (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Deutsch & Blumberg, and James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and SORONDO, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

We agree that the jury's causation finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence and affirm the trial court's order granting a new trial on the issue of damages. See Bach v. Murray, 658 So.2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The new trial is to be geared toward resolving all damages issues.

Affirmed with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases