Appellant was convicted of first degree murder, armed kidnaping, armed robbery, and grand theft. Appellant claims that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that he was a principal to the charged crimes. We think that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that appellant participated in both the robbery and murder of the victim. For example, appellant admitted his intent to participate in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
