AMATI v. CITY OF WOODSTOCK

Nos. 98-2680, 98-2681.

176 F.3d 952 (1999)

Charles AMATI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF WOODSTOCK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 4, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James T. Harrison (argued), Harrison Law Offices, Woodstock, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Thomas G. DiCianni (argued), Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Cope & Bush, Chicago, IL, for City of Woodstock.

Thomas G. DiCianni (argued), Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Cope & Bush, Chicago, IL, Joseph P. Condon, Condon & Zopp, Crystal Lake, IL, for Pitzman, Beu.

Stephen E. Balogh, III, Williams & McCarthy, Rockford, IL, Thomas G. Di-Cianni (argued), Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Cope & Bush, Chicago, IL, for Kutz.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Chief Judge.

This is a suit under the federal electronic-eavesdropping statute (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510 et seq.) against the former police chief of Woodstock, Illinois, and other former members of the Woodstock police department, complaining about the taping of calls on one of the department's telephone lines, (815) 338-7799, between February and October of 1992. (The Title III...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases