HAYWOOD v. ARANDA

No. 23860-8-II.

987 P.2d 121 (1999)

97 Wash.App. 741

Wendy HAYWOOD, Individually, Plaintiff, Deborah Hittle, Individually, Appellant, v. Ildefonsa ARANDA, and Jane Doe Aranda, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

October 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Joseph Vidlak, Seattle, for Appellant.

Charles Williamson Talbot, Charles W. Talbot & Associates Ps, Tacoma, Marilee C. Erickson, William Robert Hickman, Reed McClure, Seattle, for Respondents.


SEINFELD, J.

Deborah Hittle, a plaintiff below, appeals the trial court's denial of her CR 60 motion to vacate a jury verdict. She argued before the trial court that because Ildefonsa Aranda, the defendant below, had not filed proof of service of his demand for a trial de novo following the arbitration of Hittle's personal injury claim, the court erred in granting the trial de novo. We conclude that Hittle's failure to raise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases