1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 192 F.3d
  5. 192 F.3d 911 (1999)
 

FINK v. SHEDLER

No. 98-15668.

192 F.3d 911 (1999)

David M. FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. SHEDLER; Susan Hubbard; J. Valedez; M. Jones; T. Rosario; D. Chefthaw; Theo White, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 23, 1999.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing December 13, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Fink, pro se, Anaheim, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

James E. Flynn, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: Beezer and Trott, Circuit Judges, and King, District Judge.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc December 13, 1999.*

KING, District Judge.

David M. Fink appeals pro se the dismissal of his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Fink seeks damages for alleged Eighth Amendment violations, primarily for inadequate medical treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases