1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 49 F.Supp.2d
  5. 49 F.Supp.2d 1051 (1999)
 

ASHTON v. CITY OF MEMPHIS

Nos. 89-2863-TUA, 90-2069-TUA.

49 F.Supp.2d 1051 (1999)

William ASHTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants. Russell Aiken, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Memphis, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division.

May 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Sullivan, Memphis, TN, for plaintiff.

Louis P. Britt, III, Ford & Harrison, Memphis, TN, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

TURNER, District Judge.

These cases have been remanded to this court pursuant to the en banc decision of the Sixth Circuit in Aiken v. City of Memphis, 37 F.3d 1155 (6th Cir.1994). In that order, the Sixth Circuit instructed this court to determine whether the use of affirmative action in the 1988 and 1989 promotional processes in the Memphis Police Department ("MPD") was a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases