1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 979 P.2d
  5. 979 P.2d 114 (1999)
 

POTLATCH CORP. v. BELOIT CORP.

No. 24202.

979 P.2d 114 (1999)

132 Idaho 712

POTLATCH CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BELOIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Moscow, September 1998 Term.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elam & Burke, P.A., Boise, for appellant. Carl P. Burke argued.

Clements, Brown & McNichols, Lewiston; Sacks, Montgomery, New York, New York, for respondent. David E. Montgomery argued.

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from the amended judgment in favor of Potlatch Corporation following a jury trial on claims of breach of contract and breach of warranty. We conclude that the district court should not have allowed amendment of Potlatch's complaint to add allegations that Beloit Corporation acted in bad faith in soliciting the contract and through misrepresentations occurring during the parties' negotiations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases