FISH v. BEHERS


559 Pa. 523 (1999)

741 A.2d 721

Ruth FISH, Appellant, v. Robert BEHERS, Jr., Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 3, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol L. Hanna, Bethel Park, Scott W. Spadafore, Monongahela, for Ruth Fish.

Richard F. Welch, Michael E. Fiffik, Pittsburgh, for Robert Behers.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The presumption of paternity and the theory of estoppel and their application are the issues before this Court in this appeal. In accordance with our decision in Brinkley v. King, 549 Pa. 241, 701 A.2d 176 (1997), we hold that the presumption of paternity is inapplicable under the facts of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases