Justice HECHT delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
The sole issue in this case is whether a person who has been exposed to asbestos but does not have an asbestos-related disease may recover damages for fear of the possibility of developing such a disease in the future. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on plaintiff's claims for actual and punitive damages. A divided court of appeals reversed only on the actual damages claim.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.