1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 722 A.2d
  5. 722 A.2d 358 (1999)
 

PITT v. FRAWLEY

722 A.2d 358 (1999)

1999 ME 5

David PITT v. Alfred C. FRAWLEY, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided January 6, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Connolly (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.

Peter J. DeTroy (orally), Terry A. Fralich, Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC, Portland, for Frawley and Brann & Isaacson.

David J. Van Dyke, Berman & Simmons, Lewiston, for Dunican, Schooner Investments and Hot Springs, Inc.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

WATHEN, C.J.

[¶ 1] Plaintiff David Pitt appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) following a jury verdict in favor of defendants on Pitt's complaint. On appeal, Pitt alleges that the court erred by prohibiting him from questioning defendant attorney Alfred Frawley regarding the Maine Bar Rules and by refusing to instruct the jury on Frawley's alleged professional negligence based on those Rules. Pitt also contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases