1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 62 F.Supp.2d
  5. 62 F.Supp.2d 1015 (1999)
 

BOESEL v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.

No. 95-CV-6128-CJS.

62 F.Supp.2d 1015 (1999)

Richard C. BOESEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

June 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lonny H. Dolin, Dolin & Associates, P.C., Rochester, NY, for plaintiffs.

John Brian Kopp, Nixon, Peabody, LLP, Rochester, NY, for defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

This is an action pursuant to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., in which former employees of the defendant Chase Manhattan Bank allege that the defendants used an incorrect formula to compute their retirement benefits. The plaintiffs state that they "seek retirement benefits that are expressly granted to them at Section 7.9 of the Current Chase [Retirement] Plan and in the two [summary plan descriptions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases