1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 182 F.3d
  5. 182 F.3d 893 (1999)
 

ONEY v. RATLIFF

No. 98-1591.

182 F.3d 893 (1999)

Dale E. ONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darrell RATLIFF, Defendant-Appellee, and Jungle Rags, Inc., Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Consumer Products, Walt Disney World Company, and The Disney Store, Inc., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 12, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Carlson, Howard & Howard Attorneys, P.C., of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was Raymond E. Scott.

Robert E. Lyon, Lyon & Lyon LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Arnold E. Sklar.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Dale E. Oney appeals from the final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in Oney v. Ratliff, No. 95-CV-73410. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Darrell Ratliff and Jungle Rags, Inc. (Apr. 27, 1997) and denied Mr. Oney's motion to revise its summary judgment order (Aug. 26, 1998). The district court held that the patent issued to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases