RETZLER v. PRATT AND WHITNEY CO.

No. 1-98-2958.

723 N.E.2d 345 (1999)

309 Ill. App.3d 906

243 Ill.Dec. 313

Karen RETZLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PRATT AND WHITNEY COMPANY, Pratt and Whitney Canada, Incorporated, United Technologies Corporation, and AMR Leasing Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division.

December 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Motherway, Glenn & Napleton, P.C., Chicago (Robert J. Napleton, of counsel), for Appellant.

McCullough, Campbell & Lane, Chicago (Michael M. Lane and Rachel M. Krug, of counsel); Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago (Robert E. Haley and Jeanne E. Walker, of counsel), for Appellees.


Justice QUINN delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Karen Retzler, appeals from three orders of the circuit court disposing of her lawsuit. First, the circuit court dismissed plaintiff's second amended complaint as it related to defendant Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. (P & W Canada), with prejudice, because the complaint was barred by the two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions. Second, the circuit court granted defendant United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases