SANTIAGO v. STATE

Nos. 97-1688, 98-317.

728 So.2d 331 (1999)

Miguel Angel SANTIAGO Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Wendy Benner-Le&oacuten, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress evidence where the defendant has failed to overcome the presumption of correctness that accompanies the trial court's ruling. Smith v. State, 719 So.2d 1018, 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) ("[D]ecisions of a trial court in considering a motion to suppress come to an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and a reviewing court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases