STATE v. HANNAM

No. C1-99-120.

601 N.W.2d 454 (1999)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Bret Duane HANNAM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 21, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann E. Winking, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN (for appellant)

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, James B. Early, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Patrick A. Oman, Mower County Attorney, Austin, MN (for respondent)

Considered and decided by HARTEN, Presiding Judge, SHORT, Judge, and HOLTAN, Judge.


OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

The district court enhanced appellant's sentence after finding by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant possessed a firearm at the time he committed burglary. Appellant argues that a preponderance of the evidence is not the appropriate standard and that the enhancement statute does not apply. Because we see no error in the district court's enhancement of the sentence, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Bret Duane...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases