NEWBERRY v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON


726 A.2d 321 (1999)

319 N.J. Super. 671

Desmond NEWBERRY and Kristina Newberry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 7, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne P. Cataline, Marlton, for plaintiffs-appellants (Flynn Austin & Associates, attorneys; Ms. Cataline, on the brief).

John C. Gillespie, Moorestown, for defendant-respondent (Barron & Gillespie, attorneys; Mr. Gillespie, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, KLEINER and STEINBERG.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a tort claims case in which we are required once again to consider the relationship between N.J.S.A. 59:8-4, which prescribes the required contents of a notice of claim, and N.J.S.A. 59:8-6, which permits public entities to adopt their own tort claim forms. Disagreeing with Wood v. County of Burlington, 302 N.J.Super. 371, 695 A.2d 377...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases