FOX v. FOX

Nos. 97-2705, 98-1801.

167 F.3d 880 (1999)

Pamela Kelly FOX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Victor FOX, Individually and as Plan Administrator, Defendant-Appellant. Pamela Kelly Fox, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Victor Fox, Individually and as Plan Administrator, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided February 12, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Diana Marjorie Savit, Mendelsohn & Szymkowicz, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Kristine Kappeler Howanski, Jonathan S. Greene, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Marvin L. Szymkowicz, Mendelsohn & Szymkowicz, Washington, D.C.; Earl L. Metheny, Metheny & Miller, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge, and HERLONG, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.


Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge HERLING joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Pamela Kelly Fox brought suit to recover funds in her ex-husband's profit-sharing and retirement plans that were awarded to her in Maryland divorce proceedings. Her former husband, Arthur Victor Fox, as administrator of those plans, denied her request to qualify a state domestic relations order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases