HOEFER v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC.

No. SA CV 98-447-GLT(KY).

50 F.Supp.2d 975 (1999)

Patrick C. HOEFER, Plaintiff, v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

May 25, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Francis Pace, Pace & Rose, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff.

Rita J. Miller, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

TAYLOR, District Judge.

On three issues not yet decided by the Ninth Circuit, the Court holds California's False Claims Act does not protect federal whistleblowers, the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies to a 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim, and a state wrongful employment retaliation claim is preempted by the Federal False Claims Act.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Hoefer was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases