We reject defendant's contention that the concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years in connection with his violation of probation and 2¼ to 4½ years imposed upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree were harsh and excessive. Notably, defendant derived a substantial benefit by being allowed to plead guilty to the burglary charge in satisfaction of, inter alia, two indictments. Furthermore, County Court chose not to impose consecutive...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
